Legal Opinion

Lane County v. Land Conservation & Development Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 24, 1996No. CA A83932PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*637LANDAU, J.

Petitioner Lane County challenges the validity of a number of Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) administrative rules concerning the extent to which certain uses may be restricted in land classified as “high value farmland.” Lane County argues that the rules are invalid, because they prohibit uses that are expressly allowed by statute. LCDC and intervenor 1000 Friends of Oregon (1000 Friends) argue that the rules permissibly establish conditions for using high value farmland, consistent with the agency’s broad authority to protect agricultural land. We conclude that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Stephens v. BohlmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Brentmar v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Fish & Wildlife Department v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lane County v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Lane County v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Marquam Farms Corp. v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Nichols v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. Oregonians in Action v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API