Legal Opinion
Nichols v. Clackamas County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided April 9, 1997No. LUBA 96-046; CA A95064PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.
Petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s decision affirming Clackamas County’s denial of petitioner’s application for a farm dwelling on a 1.5-acre parcel in an exclusive farm use (EFU) zone. We affirm.
ORS 215.283(l)(f) provides that, among the nonfarm uses that may be established in EFU zones in Clackamas and other counties that have not adopted marginal lands provisions under ORS 197.247 (1991), are “dwellings and other buildings customarily provided in conjunction with farm use.” The Land Conservation and Development Commission’s (LCDC) rule codified at OAR 660-33-135(7) provides, as relevant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Brentmar v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Forster v. Polk CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Doughton v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marquam Farms Corp. v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Lindquist v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997