Legal Opinion

1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1982No. CA 19269, SC 27956PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.

This is judicial review under ORS 183.400 of a Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) rule 1 amending Statewide Planning Goal 14, the Urbanization Goal.

Goal 14 specifies requirements for local government comprehensive planning for conversion of rural land to urban land. It requires classification of land into two categories, rural and urban. It also establishes a third transitional category, urbanizable land, as that rural land which is most suitable to become urban as needed to accommodate urban population growth. Urban growth boundaries are planning devices which bound areas…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Willamette University v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Lane County v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Martin v. City of AlbanyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Curry Co.)Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API