Legal Opinion

Lane County v. Land Conservation & Development Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 17, 1996No. CA A83932PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Respondent Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) moves for reconsideration of our opinion in Lane County v. LCDC, 138 Or App 635, 910 P2d 414 (1996). We allow the motion, modify our opinion and adhere to it as modified.

Petitioner Lane County challenged the validity of certain administrative rules adopted by LCDC in 1994, governing uses that are authorized on agricultural lands, including lands designated as “high value farmland.” Lane County asserted that the rules are invalid, because they either prohibit outright or impose conditions on uses statutorily allowed by ORS 215.213,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lane County v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lane County v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Marquam Farms Corp. v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Nichols v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Oregonians in Action v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. Oregonians in Action v. Land Conservation and Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API