Marquam Farms Corp. v. Multnomah County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.
In 1995, petitioners Schillereff applied to petitioner Multnomah County for “conditional use approval, or, alternatively, an alteration of a non-conforming use,” to allow the Schillereffs to enlarge a kennel use on high-value farmland in an exclusive farm use (EFU) zone. The applicants sought to increase the use from its ostensible existing level of 50 dogs to 75. The county treated the filing as three separate applications, respectively for (1) an “initial” (i.e., new) conditional use permit, (2) an expansion of an existing conditional use, and (3) an expansion of a nonconforming use. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Brentmar v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Bither v. Baker Rock Crushing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Bither v. Baker Rock Crushing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Goose Hollow Foothills League v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Department of Land Conservation & Development v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- VanSpeybroeck v. Tillamook CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Collins v. Klamath CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Tigard Sand and Gravel, Inc. v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Washington County v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.