Legal Opinion

Oregonians in Action v. Land Conservation & Development Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 26, 1997No. CAA91720PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Petitioner seeks review of an enforcement order of the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) that required Washington County to apply provisions of OAR 660-33-120, -130, and -135 to applications for dwellings in conjunction with farm use. Those rules have been declared invalid in respects that are dispositive here. Lane County v. LCDC, 138 Or App 635, 644-45, 910 P2d 414, adhered to 140 Or App 368, 914 P2d 1114, rev allowed 324 Or 305 (1996). We therefore reverse the enforcement order and remand for reconsideration in the light of Lane County. Petitioner makes two other…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lane County v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Lane County v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Oregonians in Action v. Land Conservation and Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API