Jackson v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
The appellant appeals from a conviction for possession of a controlled substance. On motion, the Court of Appeals certified the case to this Court pursuant to Rule 29(4) (b) of the Rules of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals. We affirm the judgment of conviction.
Appellant sets out three points of appeal, and the appellee reorganizes them into two, but there is really only one issue, whether the admission of evidence, obtained with a search warrant, was proper.
A deputy sheriff went before the issuing magistrate and executed an affidavit for a search warrant, and,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McFarland v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Herrington v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- State v. BroadwaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- State v. RussellOregon Supreme Court · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.