Legal Opinion

Hall v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 29, 1990No. CR 90-77PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Appellants were charged with a felony. Both moved to suppress the evidence against them. The trial court denied the motion. They entered conditional pleas of guilty and appeal. See A.R.Cr.P. Rule 24.3(b). We reverse.

At 6:00 p.m., on February 26,1987, a confidential informant told Saline County Deputy Sheriff Tim Ryals that appellants were selling drugs illegally at their residence, and that the confidential informant had purchased marijuana from them within the last seventy-two hours. An affidavit and a search warrant were prepared by a deputy sheriff. Officer Ryals…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. BroadwaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  4. Lunsford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  5. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Fouse v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Cummings v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Garner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  5. United States v. Michael Bruce MaholyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API