Legal Opinion

State v. Russell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1982No. CA A20189, SC 28331PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.

The state appeals an order suppressing evidence found in the execution of two search warrants. The Court of Appeals, in banc, affirmed without opinion by an eVfcnly divided court. The issue is whether an informant’s credibility was established in a legally acceptable manner. We conclude that it was not.

The search warrant commanded the sheriffs "office to search certain described property for marijuana and implements of cultivation. It was based upon an affidavit in which this was the allegation to establish probable cause.

“* * * [Y]esterday I talked to informant A and took A before the Judge…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. HawkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. KockOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. People v. SherbineMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. HarpOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Moya v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API