Legal Opinion
Herrington v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 28, 1985No. CR 85-135PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.
Petitioner, Michael Herrington, was convicted by a jury of possession of a controlled substance. He appealed, arguing that the trial court erred by denying his motion to quash the search warrant since the supporting affidavit did not mention the time during which the criminal activity was observed. The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction in a three-three decision. Herrington v. State, 15 Ark. App. 248, 692 S.W.2d 251 (1985). As we granted petitioner’s petition for review, our jurisdiction is pursuant to Sup. Ct. R. 29(6). We reverse.
The primary…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McFarland v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Baxter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. Zayas-DiazCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Nelms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
- State v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Ex Parte GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.