Legal Opinion

Moore v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 12, 1988No. CR 88-58PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr. Chief Justice.

Appellants Gary Moore, Jenni Moore, and Kenneth Haskett appeal their convictions on charges of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and possession of drug paraphernalia. Appellants Paula McCray and Nathaniel Billings appeal from their convictions on charges of possession of drug paraphernalia. Trial was by jury; all five appellants were tried jointly and each elected not to testify.

On appeal, the Moores and Kenneth Haskett argue that the court erred: (1) in not granting a motion to sever based upon the introduction of incriminating…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Maryland v. GarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Cruz v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Pyle v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Brenk v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Standridge v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API