Legal Opinion
Agnew v. Parks
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 3, 1963No. Civ. 27018PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.
Plaintiff’s case was dismissed by the presiding judge of the superior court when she refused to go to trial after the court denied her motion for a further continuance. She appeals from the judgment of dismissal, and also from a denial of her motion to set aside the dismissal.
This action grows out of a previous malpractice case. It is based on an alleged conspiracy on the part of respondents to refuse to testify for her in that action. In a former appeal of the instant case a judgment for the respondents was reversed in part. (Agnew v. Parks, 172 Cal.App.2d 756 [343 P.2d 118].) The remittitur…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- People v. ManchettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. DowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Muller v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- County of San Bernardino v. Doria Mining & Engineering Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Forrest v. Department of CorporationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Cope v. CopeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Vann v. ShillehCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Berman v. KlassmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.