County of San Bernardino v. Doria Mining & Engineering Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GARDNER, P. J.
In this case we shall hopefully administer belated last rites to an alleged judicial philosophy which has badgered the courts of this state for years. That philosophy is usually expressed in language that it is “a fundamental rule that the courts should be indulgent and liberal in granting continuances.” As we shall point out, this concept has doubtful antecedents and in the context of the current law explosion is as obsolete as the bustle. Nevertheless, dilatory trial lawyers have been using that alleged judicial philosophy on trial courts for decades and when rejected,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Young v. RedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Capital National Bank v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Lorraine v. McCombCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Larson v. SolbakkenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Thurman v. Bayshore Transit Management, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Nelson v. GauntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Day v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Sawyer v. First City Financial Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Foster v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.