Legal Opinion

Forrest v. Department of Corporations

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 2007No. B186670PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DOI TODD, J.

Ernestine Forrest filed suit against respondents Vin propria persona. At the time she had been designated a vexatious litigant and was subject to a prefiling order which prohibited her from filing suit without counsel or obtaining permission from the presiding judge to proceed unrepresented. Forrest later retained counsel, but the court permitted counsel to withdraw on the day the case was set for trial. When appellant failed to. retain new counsel after a number of continuances, the court dismissed the case and later denied reconsideration of the dismissal when Forrest…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re Stephanie M.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In Re Marriage of BurgessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. In Re Marriage of ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Laabs v. City of VictorvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Shalant v. GirardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Duchrow v. ForrestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Fresno County Department of Children & Family Services v. R.H.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. In Re Social Services Payment CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API