Legal Opinion
Vann v. Shilleh
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 31, 1975No. Civ. 46083PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KINGSLEY, Acting P. J.
Defendants Shilleh and Savoir Parking Service, Inc. (Savoir) appeal from a judgment against them, entered after a trial by the court in an action for breach of contract. The sole ground urged for reversal is that the trial court compelled the defendants to appear by defendant Shilleh, a nonlawyer, appearing in propria persona and refused to grant defendants a continuance to secure new counsel. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the judgment.
Respondents Vann and Cutter filed a complaint against appellants, Shilleh and Savoir, on July 18, 1972. Appellants…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Arnold v. BrowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Kalmus v. KalmusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Fallis v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Mendoza v. Small Claims Court of Los Angeles Judicial DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Southern Electrical Supply Co. v. Raleigh County National BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- Benito Muñoz, Inc. v. Productora Puertorriqueña de Alimentos, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1980
- County of San Bernardino v. Doria Mining & Engineering Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Outdoor Services, Inc. v. Pabagold, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.