Legal Opinion
Uniden America Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 30, 2000No. Slip Op. 00-139; Court 98-05-01311PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Judge.
This matter is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs, Uniden America Corporation and Un-iden Financial, Inc. (collectively “Uniden”), challenge the determination by the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) that cordless telephones imported by Uniden do not qualify for duty-free treatment under the Generalized System of Preferences (“GSP”). See 19 U.S.C. §§ 2461-2466 (1994). 1 The court has jurisdiction over this matter under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) (1994).
Background
The article in question is a cordless handset telephone, Model CT301,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- National Juice Products Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- The Mead Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Meyer Corp., U.S. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- Cyber Power Sys. (USA) Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Avkare, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
- Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
- Energizer Battery, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.