Legal Opinion
Melbostad v. Fisher
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 23, 2008No. A119514PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SEPULVEDA, J.
Appellant Paul H. Melbostad challenges an award of attorney fees to respondent Donald G. Fisher after the trial court granted a special motion to strike (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16). He also challenges the granting of a protective order that precluded him from taking discovery related to respondent’s attorney fees motion. Because appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed, we lack jurisdiction to consider his appeal, and therefore dismiss it.
I
Factual and Procedural Background
On December 22, 2005, appellant filed a complaint against James Sutton, Kevin Heneghan, and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Dove Audio, Inc. v. Rosenfeld, Meyer & SusmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Paulus v. Bob Lynch Ford, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Daniels v. RobbinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Lucky United Properties Investment, Inc. v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Martin v. Inland Empire Utilities AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Jsj Limited Partnership v. MehrbanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Oracle Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.