Legal Opinion

Dickson, Carlson & Campillo v. Pole

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 29, 2000No. B123240PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, Acting P. J.

Two partners withdrew from a law partnership and took the firm’s largest client with them. The remaining partners decided to immediately dissolve the firm and the former partners sued the two departing partners and their new firm for declaratory relief, accounting, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, and other causes of action in two separate actions seeking, among other things, their share of the profits earned from the completion of the partnership’s unfinished business representing a defendant in numerous product liability cases. The trial court in the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. DeGarmo v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Jewel v. BoxerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Fladeboe v. American Isuzu Motors Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Brown v. GrimesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Garcia v. World Savings, FSBCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Bank of America, N.A. v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Serrano v. STEFAN MERLI PLASTERING CO.California Court of Appeal · 2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API