Legal Opinion
Doe v. Luster
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 28, 2006No. B186408PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
51 Cal.Rptr.3d 403 (2006)
145 Cal.App.4th 139
Lynn DOE, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
Elizabeth LUSTER, Defendant and Respondent.
No. B186408.
Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Seven.
November 28, 2006.
Resch Polster Alpert & Berger, Michael Baum and Sandra Khalili, Los Angeles, Plaintiff and Appellant.
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, Roy G. Weatherup and Bartley L. Becker, Los Angeles; Law Offices of Daniel B. Spitzer and Daniel B. Spitzer, Encino, for Defendant and Respondent.
PERLUSS, P.J.
Although an order granting or denying a special motion to strike filed pursuant to Code of…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Martin v. Inland Empire Utilities AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- BAHARIAN-MEHR v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Carpenter v. JACK IN THE BOX CORP.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Jackson v. YarbrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Chitsazzadeh v. Kramer & KaslowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.