Legal Opinion
Tolbert v. Martin Marietta Corp.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 20, 1988No. 87SA127PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VOLLACK, Justice.
In accordance with C.A.R. 21.1, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit has certified to the Supreme Court of Colorado a two-part question of law pertaining to a pending federal case:
Does the Workmen’s Compensation Act of Colorado, sections 8-40-101 to 8-54-127, 3B C.R.S. (1986 & 1987 Supp.), provide an exclusive remedy for an employee against her employer:(1) for injuries resulting from a sexual assault by a co-worker which was motivated by considerations neither personal to the injured employee nor distinctly associated with the employment; and(2) when the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Kandt v. EvansSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Thomas v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Aetna Life Insurance v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
- Deterts v. Times Publishing CompanyColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
- University of Denver v. NemethSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Doe v. Purity Supreme, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Triad Painting Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- In Re Quest. Sub. by US Ct. of AppealsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Horodyskyj v. KaranianSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Anderson v. Save-A-Lot, Ltd.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.