Legal Opinion

Schroeder v. City of Hartford

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 8, 1926PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

The appeal relates solely to the refusal of the trial court to set aside the verdict as contrary to law or to the facts, or both, or as excessive. It is contended, first, that the jury was not justified in finding that the plaintiff was free from contributory negligence. She was walking along her right hand portion of a much-traveled sidewalk, and, naturally, near the edge of the walk and close to the building adjoining it. Her own testimony and that of her husband afford the principal direct evidence as to her conduct at the time, and there is a decided conflict of testimony as to the extent…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roma v. Thames River Specialties Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  2. Carl v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  3. Cloughessey v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1884
  4. Landolt v. City of NorwichU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1871
  5. Wood v. City of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Zenik v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. Coner v. ChittendenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  3. Meallady v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. Frohlich v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  5. Kristiansen v. City of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API