Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Clark

California Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1993No. S022475PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

5 Cal.4th 750 (1993)

855 P.2d 729

21 Cal. Rptr.2d 509

In re WILLIAM JOHN CLARK on Habeas Corpus.

Docket No. S022475.

Supreme Court of California.

July 29, 1993.

COUNSEL

Eric S. Multhaup, Gail R. Weinheimer, Jean R. Sternberg, Denise Anton and Lynne Shatzkin Coffin, under appointments by the Supreme Court, for Petitioner.

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, George Williamson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, John H. Sugiyama, Assistant Attorney General, Morris Beatus and Dane R. Gillette, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent.

OPINION

BAXTER, J.

William John Clark petitions for a writ of habeas…

2Cases cited118 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Freddy Curiel v. Amy MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. People v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  3. (HC) Craig v. D'AgostiniDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  4. (HC) Montano v. SpearmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  5. (HC) Owens v. KoenigDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API