Legal Opinion
Freddy Curiel v. Amy Miller
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 25, 2016No. 11-56949PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Concurrence by Judge REINHARDT;
Concurrence by Judge BYBEE
OPINION
MURGUIA, Circuit Judge:
This case concerns the timeliness of Freddy Curiel’s federal habeas petition under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”). We hold that the district court erred in dismissing Curiel’s habeas petition as untimely.
*867BACKGROUND
In March 2006, a California jury convicted Curiel of special circumstances first-degree murder and street terrorism. Cu-riel was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole, plus twenty-five years.
Curiel appealed his conviction to the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Walker v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Anton E. Barker v. Gary FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- In Re SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Trigueros v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Robert Jerome Espinoza-Matthews v. People of the State of California, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Martin Valdez, Jr. v. W. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Wood v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Gerald Pizzuto, Jr. v. Randy BladesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Dajuan Flemming v. Giselle MattesonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Domonic Malone v. Brian WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.