Legal Opinion

(HC) Craig v. D'Agostini

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 31, 2019No. 2:18-cv-02612Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NORMAN JOHN CRAIG, No. 2:18-cv-2612 JAM KJN P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 JOHN D’AGOSTINI, 15 Respondent. 16 17 I. Introduction 18 Petitioner is a county jail inmate, proceeding without counsel. Respondent moves to 19 dismiss the petition on the grounds that petitioner fails to state a valid claim for federal habeas 20 relief, and because petitioner failed to exhaust his state court remedies as to all of his claims. 21 Petitioner filed an opposition; respondent did not file a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Muhammad v. CloseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Russell L. O'Bremski v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Raymond Edward Middleton v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Willie Gordon v. Robert DuranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API