Legal Opinion

(HC) Owens v. Koenig

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 17, 2020No. 2:20-cv-01394Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CLAUDE LEE OWENS, No. 2:20-cv-1394 KJN P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 CRAIG KOENIG, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 20 Examination of the in forma pauperis affidavit reveals that petitioner is unable to afford 21 the costs of suit. Accordingly, the request for leave…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ayers v. BelmontesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. James M. Patton and Joann Patton, Legal Guardians for Thomas Edward Patton v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  3. In Re RobbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API