Moloney v. City of Columbus
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.
Recovery of damages for Nonnie Moloney, mother of the injured minor herein, is predicated upon a determination by this court that the petition of such minor does state a cause of action against the defendant herein. The two actions may, therefore, he consolidated for the purposes of appeal. Hence, only a single amended petition will be referred to herein.
The issue before this court is whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas which sustained the defendant’s demurrer to the amended petition.
The amended petition reads, in pertinent part, as…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- City of Wooster v. ArbenzOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- City of Fort Worth v. WigginsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Hibbard v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- City of Mangum v. BrownleeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schenkolewski v. Cleveland Metroparks SystemOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Ranells v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Carpenter v. Scherer-Mountain Insurance AgencyOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- Krause v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1971
- Ohio Department of Natural Resources v. Hemlock Pipeline, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.