Ranells v. City of Cleveland
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPaul W. Bbown, J.
We are asked to decide whether the city of Cleveland, having admitted negligence in the operation of its Water Department, can be held liable in punitive damages for alleged wanton misconduct.
Ohio law is well established that a municipal corporation, while acting in a governmental capacity, is immune from liability for tortious conduct. It is equally clear that when acting in a proprietary capacity, a municipal corporation may generally be held liable for tortious conduct in the same manner as would a private corporation or individual.1 Neither of those basic principles; embodied in this…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Saberton v. GreenwaldOhio Supreme Court · 1946
- Chappell v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Fisher v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
- Helleren v. DixonOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- Costich v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Genty v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Hawkins v. IvyOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- City of Gladewater v. PikeTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Villella v. Waikem Motors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.