Legal Opinion
City of Fort Worth v. Wiggins
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided May 2, 1928No. 917 — 4999PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpeer, J.
The case is thus stated by
Chief Justice Conner for the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District (299 S. W. 468):
“Appellant, for himself and as next friend for his minor son, Jack Wiggins, instituted this suit against the appellee city for damages, on grounds hereinafter set out, and has duly prosecuted this appeal from an order sustaining the city’s general demurrer to the petition setting forth the plaintiffs’ cause of action.
“In ’ said petition, omitting formal parts, it is charged, in substance, and as quoted, that the defendant city is a municipal corporation, duly incorporated and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cawthorn v. City of HoustonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Ostrom v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1901
- Whitfield v. City of ParisTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- White v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1901
- Wiggins v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- City of Houston v. QuinonesTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- City of Amarillo v. WareTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- Dilley v. City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Braun v. Trustees of Victoria Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- City of Fort Worth v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.