Legal Opinion

City of Mangum v. Brownlee

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 11, 1938No. 27685PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIttjrst, J.

A bear, belonging to the city of Mangum, bit E'arl Brownlee on the leg. and he sued for damages. The undisputed facts are ■ substantially as follows : The city owned a park: in which it maintained a swimming pool and a small zoo. The bear’s den was just north of the swimming pool and consisted of a pit enclosed by a rock wall. The wall surrounding the pit extended about two feet above the ground. The only entrance to the den was by way of an underground passage leading from the inside of the bathhouse adjacent to the pool.

The bear escaped from its den and was caught by a visitor in the park…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Tonkawa v. DanielsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Northwest Hay Association v. ChaseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Pacific Feed Co. v. KennelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hoggard v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  2. Karen Jutzi-Johnson, as Administrator of the Estate of Robert Johnson, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. Wetsel v. Independent School District I-1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  5. Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API