Legal Opinion

Liebler v. Point Loma Tennis Club

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 1995No. D019570PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NARES, J.

Kenneth Liebler (Liebler) appeals a judgment in favor of defendant Point Loma Tennis Club Community Corporation (PLTC), following a determination the PLTC declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions did grant PLTC the authority to enact rules which exclude Liebler, a nonresident owner, from using the common area recreational facilities.

Liebler contends (1) the PLTC covenants, conditions and restrictions do not grant PLTC such a power of exclusion; (2) the rules and regulations which exclude nonresident owners from common area recreational facilities are unreasonable;…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village Condominium Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Salazar v. EastinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. People Ex Rel. Lynch v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Major v. Miraverde Homeowners Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Bernardo Villas Management Corp. v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dolan-King v. Rancho Santa Fe Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Bogomolov v. Lake Villas Condominium Ass'n of Apartment OwnersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. Pacific Hills Homeowners Association v. PrunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Bogomolov v. LAKE VILLAS CONDOMINIUM ASS'NCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. Carolyn v. Orange Park Community Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API