Legal Opinion

Bernardo Villas Management Corp. v. Black

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1987No. D004256PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WIENER, J.

Plaintiff Bernardo Villas Management Corporation Number Two (Bernardo Villas Management) appeals from the judgment in favor of defendants Mary Black and Kenneth Trout. We affirm.

Mary Black and Kenneth Trout lived in a condominium managed by Bernardo Villas Management. The condominium was subject to a declaration of covenants and restrictions which included: “No truck, camper, trailer, boat of any kind or other form of recreational vehicle shall be parked on the [Bernardo] Villas 6 project, except temporarily and solely for the purposes of loading and unloading, without the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hidden Harbour Estates, Inc. v. NormanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  2. Sterling Village Condominium, Inc. v. BreitenbachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  3. Ritchey v. Villa Nueva Condominium Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Flowers v. John Burnham & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village Condominium Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. City of Oceanside v. McKennaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Liebler v. Point Loma Tennis ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village Condominium Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village Condominium Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API