Legal Opinion

Pacific Hills Homeowners Association v. Prun

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 2008No. G038244PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RYLAARSDAM, Acting P. J.

Defendants Jon L. Prun and Linda L. Prun appeal from a judgment requiring them to reduce the height of or move a gate and a fence in the front of their residence that violates the height and setback requirements in the covenants, conditions, and restrictions and architectural guidelines adopted by plaintiff Pacific Hills Homeowners Association. They contend the action was not subject to the five-year statute of limitations in Code of Civil Procedure section 336, subdivision (b) (all further statutory references are to this code unless otherwise noted) as the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarcheCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Johnson v. City of Loma LindaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Coleman v. DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL ADMININISTRATIONCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Beal Bank, SSB v. Arter & Hadden, LLPCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. MALATKA v. HelmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Mendoza v. RuesgaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Clear Lake Riviera Community Assn. v. CramerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Lent v. Cal. Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Lent v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API