People Ex Rel. Lynch v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BURKE, J.
The Attorney General, on behalf of the People of the State of California, seeks by petition for writ of mandate to secure a determination from this court that the provisions of section 537 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which specify the actions in which prejudgment attachment may issue, are void in their entirety. Cited in support of the petition is Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. (1969) 395 U.S. 337 [23 L.Ed.2d 349, 89 S.Ct. 1820]. We issued an order to show cause.
As ruled in the companion cases of McCallop v. Carberry, ante, p. 903 [83 Cal.Rptr. 666, 464 P.2d 122] and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People Ex Rel. Mosk v. National Research Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- McCallop v. CarberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Cline v. Credit Bureau of Santa Clara ValleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People Ex Rel. Mosk v. LynamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re William M.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Chern v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.