Legal Opinion

Major v. Miraverde Homeowners Assn.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 19, 1992No. B048423PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*621Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

Plaintiffs sought a preliminary injunction restraining a condominium homeowners association from enforcing certain rules plaintiffs contended unreasonably interfered with their right to use the recreational facilities of the condominium project. The trial court denied an injunction. We reverse the denial of injunctive relief as to the Rasmussens. The appeal of Ms. MaJor is dismissed as moot.

Statement of Facts and Proceedings Below

John and Donna Rasmussen, husband and wife, own a condominium unit in the Miraverde condominium project. The project is managed by the Miraverde…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Coulter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. IT Corp. v. County of ImperialCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Ritchey v. Villa Nueva Condominium Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Shell Oil Co. v. RichterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Ticor Title Insurance v. Rancho Santa Fe Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. DelfinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Petaluma City School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1993
  3. Stamps v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Prigmore v. City of ReddingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics, Inc. v. Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API