Chaney v. Department of Transportation
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrickley, J.
This case asks us to decide whether the highway exception to governmental immunity1 encompasses a concrete bridge abutment and adjoining guardrail adjacent to, but beyond the shoulder of, a state trunk line entrance ramp and overpass. The Court of Appeals relied upon our plurality opinion in Scheurman v Dep’t of Transportation, 434 Mich 619; 456 NW2d 66 (1990), to reverse the Court of Claims denial of defendant’s motion for summary disposition. While we agree with the result reached by the Court of Appeals, we do not fully endorse its rationale. 198 Mich *152App 728; 499 NW2d 29 (1993). We hold…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Lorencz v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Scheurman v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- Roy v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
- Gregg v. State Highway DepartmentMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Haliw v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Pick v SzymczakMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
- Moser v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Cox v. City of Dearborn HeightsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Wechsler v. Wayne County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.