Legal Opinion

Pick v Szymczak

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1996No. 98142, Calendar No. 7PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*610Cavanagh, J.

This case requires us to revisit the still-unsettled issue of the highway exception to governmental immunity, MCL 691.1402; MSA 3.996(102). Presented for our review in this appeal is the plaintiffs’ claim that defendant Gratiot County Road Commission breached its duty to provide traffic control devices and warning signs, “that Scheurman [v Dep’t of Transportation and] Prokop [v Wayne Co Bd of Rd Comm’rs, 434 Mich 619; 456 NW2d 66 (1990)] are dis-positive that the road commission had a duty to . . . repair and maintain the improved traveled portion of the roadway, but did not have…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Skinner v. Square D Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Tuttle v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Scheurman v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  4. City of Grand Rapids v. Grand Rapids Lodge No 97, Fraternal Order of PoliceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Salvati v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Nawrocki v. MacOmb County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Dickens v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
  3. Hanson v. Mecosta County Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Attorney General v. Public Service Commission No 2Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. State v. StewardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API