Legal Opinion

Moser v. City of Detroit

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 2009No. Docket 283922PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtServitto, J.

Defendant Michigan Department of Transportation appeals as of right the circuit court’s order denying its motion for summary disposition. Because the fascia of the bridge is a part of the improved portion of the highway designed for vehicular travel, we affirm.

Plaintiff was injured when a chunk of concrete fell from the fascia of an overpass (the Cass Avenue Bridge) and crashed through his windshield as he drove on 1-75 below Cass Avenue. Although Cass is a city-owned street, defendant has contractually agreed to maintain and repair all of its bridge’s structure; the city maintains only the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Nawrocki v. MacOmb County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Grimes v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Chaney v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Markillie v. Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Hanlin v. Saugatuck TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. ZCD Transportation, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Tracy C Brickey v. Vincent Lavon McCarverMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Michigan Municipal Risk Management AuthorityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Johnson v. ReccaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API