Legal Opinion

Roy v. Department of Transportation

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1987No. Docket 78864PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Per curiam

MCL 691.1402; MSA 3.996(102) provides an exception to governmental immunity for tort liability in favor of "[a]ny person sustaining bodily injury or damage to his property by reason of failure of any governmental agency to keep any highway under its jurisdiction in reasonable repair, and in condition reasonably safe and fit for travel . . . .” However, the statute provides that the governmental agency’s duty to repair and maintain, and its potential liability, "shall extend only to the improved portion of the highway designed for vehicular travel and shall not include sidewalks, crosswalks or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Maki v. City of East TawasMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Commissioners of Highways v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Maki v. City of East TawasMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Nawrocki v. MacOmb County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Scheurman v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Grimes v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Velmer v. Baraga Area SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Mason v. Wayne County Board of CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1994

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API