Scheurman v. Department of Transportation
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*623Riley, C.J.
We granted leave to appeal in these two cases, consolidated for purposes of this appeal, to decide whether the highway exception1 to governmental immunity2 imposes upon the state or the counties the duty to: (1) install street lighting, and (2) remove, or cause to be removed, vegetation growing on private property which obstructs the view of motorists approaching an intersection.
With regard to the state and the counties, the liability created by the highway exception statute extends "only to the improved portion of the highway designed for vehicular travel and shall not include…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Tuttle v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Hadfield v. Oakland County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Reardon v. Department of Mental HealthMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Nawrocki v. MacOmb County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- MacK v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Brown v. Manistee County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
- Hanson v. Mecosta County Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Pick v SzymczakMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.