Legal Opinion

Jones v. Bailey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1957No. 30PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenNY, J.

The defendant’s first assignment of error is based on an exception to the admission of certain testimony in the trial below over the defendant’s objection. The plaintiff was permitted to testify that after the accident he heard a conversation between the defendant, Mrs. Bailey, and an officer, at the hospital. The testimony of the plaintiff, to which objection was made and exception entered, was as follows: “Q. What did Mrs. Bailey say? A. As we walked in the hospital, Mrs. Bailey and Mrs. Patton were sitting there and she asked the officer if she had the right of way and the officer said she…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Shelton v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. State v. TewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. State v. . LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. State v. . GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. King v. Bynum.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  3. State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Ponder v. CobbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. State v. AldridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API