State v. Rogers
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHusiciNS, J.
Defendant moved to quash the bill of indictment on the ground that jurors opposed to capital punishment were challenged for cause, asserting that it was error to permit individual jurors to be questioned as to their belief in capital punishment. The record contains the following entry with respect to selection of the jury: "Immediately prior to the presentation of the State’s evidence, the jury was duly selected as required by law. During the interrogation of the individual jurors the State inquired of each juror: ‘Do you believe in capital punishment in certain cases as provided by law?’ ”…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- State v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. JarretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.