State v. Aldridge
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
The evidence, when considered in the light most favorable to the State, was sufficient to warrant submission to the jury and to support the verdict and judgment. Hence, assignments of error directed to the court’s refusal to allow defendant’s motions for judgment as in case of nonsuit (G.S. 15-173) are overruled. In this connection, see S. v. Bowman, 231 N.C. 51, 55 S.E. 2d 789, and cases cited.
The prosecutrix was, and for some years had been, married to one Joseph Larosa Williams.
On direct examination, the prosecutrix, the State’s first witness, in response to a question asked by the court,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Shelton v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- State v. . StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- State v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Ledford v. Valley River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- State v. TewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. Van LandinghamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. BadgettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. BarrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. AycothSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.