Legal Opinion

State v. . Lassiter

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 17, 1926PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.

Hearsay evidence is defined in King v. Bynum, 137 N. C., 495, as follows: “Evidence, oral or written, is called hearsay when its probative force depends in whole or in part upon the competency and credibility of some person other than the witness by whom it is sought to produce it.” In the case of Mima Queen v. Hepburn, 7 Cranch, 290, Chief Justice Marshall held the principle to be that hearsay evidence is incompetent to establish any specific fact in its nature susceptible of being proved by witnesses who speak from their own knowledge. It is a rule of evidence that hearsay is in its own…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Queen v. HepburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
  2. Daniel v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. King v. Bynum.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Hunsucker v. CorbittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. Sutton v. . LyonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. State v. MurvinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Parrish v. Boysell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. State v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. State v. TilleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API