State v. . Godwin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
DenNY, J..
The defendants excepted to and assigned as error, the admission of certain evidence, purely collateral in character and which they contend was prejudicial to them. George Elliott, a witness fpr the State, who admitted he had had trouble with the defendant,. Miss Ada Godwin, was permitted to testify that about a month before the commission of the alleged crime, for which the defendants were on trial, that he had started to Miss Ada Godwin’s house to see her relative to a fire and that he met her at Dale’s Filling Station and said to her: “I want to see you, I have had a lot of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shelton v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- State v. . StancillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- State v. . MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- State v. . WaltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- Gray v. . CartwrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. Van LandinghamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. BadgettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. TewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.