Legal Opinion
May v. City of Kearney
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided January 23, 1945No. Nos. 31837, 31838PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.
Plaintiffs Charles E. May and Consumers Public Power District filed separate amended petitions in the district court for Buffalo county, Nebraska, to permanently enjoin defendant City of Kearney and its officials from issuing bonds for the purpose of raising money to tender an award made by a court of condemnation in proceedings brought by the city against plaintiff Consumers Public Power District as provided by section 70-650, R. S. 1943, and chapter 19, art. 7, R. S. 1943, wherein the city sought to acquire the electric light and power plant and distribution system serving the inhabitants…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States v. Ju ToySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Reetz v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- National Union F. Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. BruecksNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
- City of Scottsbluff v. TiemannNebraska Supreme Court · 1970
- Nickel v. School Board of AxtellNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
- State ex rel. Nelson v. ButlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
- Peoples National Bank v. Linebarger Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.