State ex rel. Baughn v. Ure
Nebraska Supreme Court
Original application for a writ of mandamus to compel respondent to accept filing fee, to enable relator to become a candidate for city clerk of the city of Omaha.
1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.
This is a proceeding’ in mandamus to compel William G. Ure, as city treasurer of the city of Omaha, to receive from the relator the filing fee of $5 provided by law to enable him to file his application to have his name placed upon the ballot at the primary election in 1912 as a candidate for the office of city clerk provided for in chapter 12a, Comp. St. 1909, governing cities of the metropolitan class.
Relator alleges his tender and the refusal by respondent of. the lawful fee; the reason given being that the office of city clerk is no longer an elective office in said city, and that he as…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Van Horn v. State ex rel. AbbottNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- In Re PfahlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Eckerson v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- People ex rel. Stuckart v. KnopfIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Sarlls, City Clerk v. State, Ex Rel.Indiana Supreme Court · 1929
- State ex rel. Wilkinson v. LaneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- O'Laughlin v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- State ex rel. Simpson v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Howard v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.