Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Earhart v. City of Bristol

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1998PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LYLE REID, Special Justice.

This case presents for review the Court of Appeals’ decisions that municipal annexation ordinances may be subject to review under the declaratory judgment statute, and that the trial court did not err in declining to issue a declaratory judgment in this case. That court’s decision is affirmed on the first issue, but reversed on the second issue, and the case is remanded to the trial court.

I

The issues presented had their origin in two annexation ordinances adopted by the City of Bristol in 1989. The ordinances undertook to annex the right-of-way of Highway 11E…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Carson Creek Vacation Resorts, Inc. v. State, Department of RevenueTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. SligerTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Alexander Oil Company v. City of SeguinTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Worrall v. Kroger Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. NettoTennessee Supreme Court · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Lavin v. JordonTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Highwoods Properties, Inc. v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State Ex Rel. Condon v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Tennessee Division of United Daughters of Confederacy v. Vanderbilt UniversityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  5. Tracey George v. Tre HargettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API