Legal Opinion

Lavin v. Jordon

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 2000No. M1997-00259-SC-R11-CVPublishedCited by 126 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarker, J.

in which ANDERSON, C.J., and DROWOTA and HOLDER, JJ., joined.

OPINION

The nature of this appeal regards the amount of damages recoverable in an action against parents for the intentional damage caused by their children. More specifically, we granted this appeal to determine whether Tennessee Code Annotated section 37-10-103(a) represents a codification of the common law tort allowing unlimited damages, or whether section 37-10-103(a) merely sets forth the circumstances under which parents may be held liable and is therefore subject to the statutory cap on damages contained in section 37-10-102.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hodges v. S.C. Toof & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Union Carbide Corp. v. HuddlestonTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  3. McClenahan v. CooleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Ganzevoort v. RussellTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Smith v. GoreTennessee Supreme Court · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by126 opinions

  1. Tina Marie Hodge v. Chadwick CraigTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Houghton v. Aramark Educational Resources, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In re C.K.G.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Guy v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Penley v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API