Alexander Oil Company v. City of Seguin
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GONZALEZ, Justice.
The key issue in this case is whether the Texas Legislature intended to allow a private party judicial relief to set aside annexation for alleged procedural irregularities, or whether the complaints may only be raised in a quo warranto proceeding. Alexander Oil Company (“Alexander”) brought suit as a private party to void the annexation of its property by the City of Seguin (“the City”). Alexander alleged that the City did not comply with the notice, hearing or service plan requirements of the Municipal Annexation Act. 1 Both parties moved for summary judgment, and…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Deacon v. City of EulessTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Graham v. City of GreenvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Kuhn v. City of YoakumTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- City of Irving v. Dallas County Flood Control DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- State Ex Rel. Rose v. City of La PorteTexas Supreme Court · 1965
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- City of Rockwall v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- Laidlaw Waste Systems (Dallas), Inc. v. City of WilmerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Neeley v. West Orange-Cove Consolidated Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Save Our Springs Alliance, Inc. v. Lazy Nine Municipal Utility District Ex Rel. Board of Directors, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
- Highwoods Properties, Inc. v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.