Legal Opinion

Worrall v. Kroger Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1977PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COOPER, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from a decree of the Chancery Court of Davidson County that the Kroger Company can offset all personal property taxes paid the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County against the gross receipts tax owed by Kroger to Metro under the Business Tax Act.

The Kroger Company filed this action against R. E. Worrall, the County Court Clerk of Davidson County, seeking a refund of gross receipts taxes assessed under the "Business Tax Act” and paid under protest.

The taxpayer, the Kroger Company, is engaged in the business of operating retail…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moto-Pep, Inc. v. McGoldrickTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  2. State Ex Rel. Rector v. WilkesTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Rose v. BlewettTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Moto-Pep v. McGoldrickTennessee Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. State v. GarrisonTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Carson Creek Vacation Resorts, Inc. v. State, Department of RevenueTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  3. ARC LifeMed, Inc. v. AMC-Tennessee, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  4. United States v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. Austin v. Memphis Publishing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1983

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API